Silicon Valley companies choose impact of governmental lobbying


They may be experts of breakthrough in certain sectors, still startups like Sidecar, etc. are learning that in regard to Washington, D.C., the earlier approaches are the most effective.
In the previous couple of months, various young technological enterprises have put their faith in the power of money to have an effect on federal government guidelines and/or legislation. A number of lobbied the government for the first time, while some others broadened lobbying campaigns by launching specialized practices in the UNITED STATES. capital.
The firms going after many of these attempts are typically those challenging existing business models, in departments similar to the sharing economy and/or streaming information over the web. Once new business models arise, they often bump up towards aging regulations.
Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist: Without doubt, lobbying from the tech community isn't new. Microsoft and IBM happen to have been at it for ages, furthermore Google at this time is the leader in the industry in money invested. Though the journeys by smaller companies are important simply because they are at odds with the whole picture they represent of scrappy start-ups battling the structure - the same establishment they are now having to cozy up to.

Within the last 3 months, Fitbit, ... all started out lobbying in Washington D.C. for on the first attempt, each paying D.C. - centered lobbying organisations to keep track of moves by the government and lawmakers that may perhaps have an effect on their business.
A number of businesses went a step further and created their own practice in D.C., with their own lobbyist. An in office lobbyist doesn't have to split time along with other clients and helps assure a company has a 'seat at the table' in interactions of policy or legal matters.
Aereo, the New York company that desires to stream over-the-air TV to computer screens, revamped its efforts in D.C. after tv producers, cable providers and others managed to convince the Supreme Court that its company system should be illegal.

Maurice Aguirre Dallas: The necessity to lobby is actually greatest in industries that have strong, recognized players. Ride-sharing companies are rising to taxi companies, by way of example, and media streaming companies are juggling tv stations, cable providers and also the recording field.

These opponents usually have deep roots in Washington, are well funded and can't stand the disruption the Internet has delivered.
In home entertainment, for example, Netflix invested $1.3 million on federal lobbying just the previous year, although the National Cable and Telecommunications Association spent $20 million. Comcast, Time Warner and a host of entertainment and transmission businesses devoted several millions more.

Various words and phrases you could possibly encounter on the Philanthropist Maurice Aguirre Dallas webpage:

Lobbyist: Person who advocates on behalf of himself or a client to pass a law or to make changes to a bill being considered in a federal or state legislative body, or to help shape policy in the executive branch and its regulatory departments. Lobbyists can come from either the private sector or from a legislative affairs department in a federal agency. There are two types of lobbyists: grassroots and professional. The House and Senate includes in its "Guide to the Lobbying Disclosure Act" a definition of a lobbyist as: "any individual (1) who is either employed or retained by a client for financial or other compensation; (2) whose services include more than one lobbying contact; and (3) whose lobbying activities constitute 20 percent or more of his or her services during a three-month period." If this is the case, then this person must register as a lobbyist under the Lobbying Disclosure Act.

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - Companion bill: A piece of legislation considered in one house of Congress, which is identical or similar to legislation in the other house.

Registrant: An organization that registers with the Secretary of the Senate or the Clerk of the House as either lobbying on behalf of another organization (e.g., a lobbying firm representing a client) or lobbying on its own interests. Registrant organizations are required to file lobbying financial disclosure reports and contribution reports. Maurice Aguirre Washington DC

Revolving door: Describes the transition of serving in Congress to working as a lobbyist. Critics see this as negative, because this allows congressional leaders to lobby their former colleagues. To prevent conflicts of interest, the House has enacted a one-year ban on former members from lobbying their peers. Former senators may not be involved in lobbying activities for two years as of Jan. 1, 2008. House and Senate staffers are banned for a year from lobbying their former employer; committee staffers are banned for a year from lobbying anyone who served on the committee on which they worked.




Facebook Twitter Pinterest Flickr Instagram LinkedIn share
online portfolio